Archive for the ‘Pictures’ Category

I got a new camera!

Saturday, April 1st, 2006

Sculpture Falls is flowing. It’s nice. I’m gonna have a thing with food there next Saturday, maybe there. Everybody’s invited. Let me know if you’re coming, so I’ll know how much food to get. Gonna get a Hibachi or something.

I got a new camera, a Rebel XT with an 17-85mm IS lens. It takes pictures in the fucking dark. I posted some pictures of the Greenbelt from Sunday . There’s also some test shots. Some of the pics are kind of grainy, because I was basically walking around in the dark or shooting in my living room, and there’s not much light there.

I love this camera.

I love oblivion, too, but it’s 3:34, so I’ll write about that some other time.

W00t! There’s water at the Greenbelt!

Saturday, March 11th, 2006

I went down to Scottish Woods Trail today; I haven’t been out there in, Idunno, too many months, but I don’t remember there being a lot of water there last time–it was kind of a foul-smelling puddle. Since I’d told Happie and Beth yesterday that there would be water there if there was water anywhere, I resolved to go out today and check it out myself.

There’s water there. Lots of water. This much water. It’s cool and it’s clear and it smells good, at least the pool above the lower dam. You can find me there every saturday afternoon from now until there’s water somewhere better. I might go some mornings too.

The pictures I got today are kind of so-so; Scottish woods looks a lot better in the morning, because the sky on the pretty(-er) side isn’t full of sun. There are some pictures of it in summer here. It looks a lot the same, except with flowers and leaves.

I…just…can’t…stop…thinking…

Tuesday, March 7th, 2006

I’m getting a good-sized chunk of money. Most of it is spoken for by my esteemed creditors, but between what’s left over and my semiannual bonus, I’ve got about $2700 of money. I’ve decided to spend it on a camera because, well, I want to really bad.

I work hard, I figure I deserve it.

Anyway, I’ve spent about every waking hour for the last couple of weeks obsessing about what to get. The problem is that there are so many choices. Not just of camera, but of lens. For the camera, I’ve decided I’m getting one of either:

  1. The Caonon EOS-20D. This is one of the nicest “prosumer” cameras out there, certainly the nicest near its $1100 street price.
  2. The Canon EOS-350D. This is kind of the EOS-20D’s little brother. It’s smaller, lighter, is made of plastic instead of magnesium, and has slightly fewer features, but is basically functionally very similar and has basically identical picture quality under almost any circumstances I’m likely to use it in. The only downside is that it’s not as sturdy, or quite as cool. It sells for about $700.

Of course, the camera is only half the story, if that. Once I’ve got a camera, I’ll need a lens to go with it, or it won’t be very good for taking pictures. More precisely, I’ll need two. I need a short lens and a long lens, because a lot of the work I do (in terms of picture-takin’) is nature and critter pics. That’s one of the things I really wish I had in my current camera, a really long lens.

For the short lens, there are basically two choices, the 18-55mm lens that costs about $50 when bought as a kit with either of the two cameras above. It’s a sort-of okay lens. The front element rotates when it focuses, which means that if I had a polarizer on it (which I generally do), then I’d have to adjust it for basically every shot. I really don’t like the though of that at all.

The other choice is the EF-S 17-85MM USM IS lens. This is a nice lens that doesn’t have the aforementioned problem, and which has a small gyroscope and motor that, to make a long story short, keeps camera shake from ruining your pictures, so you can hand-hold the camera in low light. This lens costs about $500, a little cheaper if bought in a kit with the 20D (it doesn’t come in a kit with the 350D).

So far, so good. That second lens is a little expensive, but not too bad.

The problem starts with the long lens. See, short lenses aren’t necessarily cheap, but they’re almost by definition cheaper than a long lens of the same quality. And if you want to take pictures of birds, say, for instance, the hummingbirds that are going to be around in a few months, then you need a long lens indeed. You need a lens like the Canon EF 100-400mm USM IS f4.5-f5.6L zoom lens, which is a nice lens that costs about $1400. If you want a nice blurry background to isolate your subject, you want a really fast long lens, which makes the aforementioned none-too-cheap lense look inexpensive. You could, for instance, get the Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L USM IS lens, which goes for about $1700; however, since 200mm is way smaller than 400mm, to take pictures of those birds, you’d need to throw down another $300 or so for a 2x teleconverter, making this somewhat nicer lens about $600 more expensive.

See, I want one of those lenses. I want the nicer lens, and I want the nicer camera, but if you add the nice short lens, the really nice long lens, and the nicer camera together, you get $2000+$500+$1100+tax+shipping+$200 in filters, which is considerably more than the $2700 I theoretically have to spend. Compromises will have to be made. Something will have to be deferred until a later time. Something may never get bought.

So, what’s my best strategy for maximizing what I can get for my money? This is the question that I’ve been pondering all the time lately. Maybe it’s because I don’t really have anything better to do with my life. Maybe it’s because my favorite spacetime for the taking of pictures is coming up soon and I don’t want to mess up the chance to document the beauty I see around me every spring. I want to convey to others the feeling I get when I’m sitting in paradise a few miles from my house, drinking beer and lounging in the water and listening to the birds sing. I want the tools to do that. Maybe it’s just because I’m a gearhead.

My current thinking is cheaper camers (350D), cheaper short lens (18-55), less expensive long lens (100-400), and polarizing and UV filters for both, along with an extra battery and a big CF card to store all the pictures on. That’s $775+$1400+the rest. I should probably stop thinking about it now. Except….damn.

Neighborhood pictures

Friday, March 3rd, 2006

Note: My brother and I and hopefully/probably some other people are going to go see Dave Chappelle’s Block Party tomorrow night at 7:40pm at the Alamo South. If I haven’t already invited you personally, and you wanna go, then you prolly should get a ticket in advance.

Okay, so, just to spite me, my E-10 seems to be working okay again. Yay E-10!

I took advantage of some good light this afternoon to wander around my back yard and neighborhood and take a bunch of pictures of my usual favorites: flowers, bees, and cats. I also took a lot of pictures of fences today, don’t know why, and a bunch of pictures of ivy.

They’re in this gallery.

One of the ivy pics, this one:

I decided would look better in black and white, with the background leaves burned darker and a small tear in one leaf fixed. This was a bit harder than I’d figured, but came out pretty good:

Other than that one, they’re mostly just wallpaper, but some of them are kind of pretty wallpaper. If you like my cats you might wanna check ‘em out.

I hope I’m not turning into that lady that always works in accounting that has pictures of her goddamned pets all over her cube because she doesn’t have a picture of a person to put there.

Not likely though–I’ve got more pictures of bees than my cats. Probably also of random zoo monkeys. I’m not sure if that’s an improvement. Plus, hardly anybody turns into a lady if they didn’t start out as one.

I think I might go see a movie. I was going to go see Ultra Violet, but I can’t find any reviews. Usually that means that the studio didn’t screen it for reviewers, which usually means it sucks more ass than a Hoover with a wet-dry enema attachment.

I….broke it…*sob*

Tuesday, February 28th, 2006

Last night I turned on the little camera I talked so much shit about a couple of days ago and was greeted with a brilliant prismatic puddle punctuated with radiant fracture lines, a tiny silicon spider web of sadness. No picture except for the very bottom. Broken LCD.

I’ve got a 2-year warranty from Fry’s, but it specifically excludes broken screens. I’ll try anyway, but the chances seem pretty slim.

I’m not exactly brokenhearted about it–I wasn’t exactly in love with the damned thing–but I am pissed off. I know I’m not easy on electronics–or anything else, for that matter–but I didn’t inflict any particular trauma on this camera, that I’m aware of. It was in my coat pocket all day. It’s just a cheap piece of crap, the kind of thing I’m not used to getting from Sony, but am starting to see from them more and more often. It pisses me off. That’s almost a day and a half take-home pay down the drain. 12 hours gone from my life, and for what? Twenty fucking pictures? Fuck you, Sony!

Grrr….Grrr….Grrr….Grrrr…

You get what you pay for, I suppose. It’s just that I thought I was getting a cheap camera because it had limited functionality, not because it breaks if you look at it wrong.

I am hard on things, I guess. In refutation of the utter super-breakable crap that permeates the world today, here’s my list of things that last:

  • Motorola StarTAC — This phone was the bomb. As good the day I stopped using it as the day I started.
  • Sanyo SCP-5150 — This phone made the StarTAC look like a little bitch. I took this phone for swims with me just so it wouldn’t get lonely. It was eaten by a Chihuahua. It was dropped down cliffs. I used to throw it down on concrete sidewalks and stomp on it just to demonstrate how indestructible it was. I bought the successor model to this phone, the PM-8200, just because I was so impressed with the 5150. It seems like a good decision so far–Half the pretty is knocked off the outside, but the camera and both displays still work, even after a couple of good dunkings and a memorable episode involving the phone and I taking parallel 5-foot falls onto limestone (the phone came through it better than I did).
  • Doc Martens — I’ve had two pairs of boots and a pair of shoes. They’re the most durable shoes I’ve ever had, period…and I’m hard on shoes.
  • Structure 6-button polo — I’ve had a pair of these shirts since I was 19, and they’re still going strong. Not a rip in ‘em, and you know that’s not due to my careful storage and use. Structure used to make some damn fine shirts. I also had a couple of their raw silk “Architect’s Work Shirt”s, and they lasted a large number of years, too.

…sadly, that’s about it.

Winter at Spyglass, and a cheap-ass camera.

Sunday, February 26th, 2006

Ed. Note: I dropped over by the greenbelt entrance on spyglass and made a few pictures with the crappy new camera I talk about below.

My main camera has started getting about 20 pictures on a set of batteries, and unless I can figure out what’s going wrong or fix it myself, is not likely to get fixed. The economics just don’t really warrant it–it’s a $300 camera, and it seems unlikely it’d get fixed for less than $200. Even if it’s less than that, I’m kind of reluctant to dump more money in a camera that lately seems more and more limited. Maybe I’m just looking for an excuse to buy a new camera.

In any case, I managed to convince myself that I needed a backup camera, in case I, say for instance, went on vacation and found out my “real” camera was not working correctly. So, I went down and got myself a teeny little Sony DSC-S600, Which is a very small, very basic 6MP camera. I picked it up for $230, including tax and a 2-year warranty from Fry’s.

I’m pretty torn about this camera. The voice of frugality tells me to take the camera back and keep the money, because it doesn’t do many of the things that I want. However, anybody know knows me knows that that voice of frugality is usually muffled by the door of the small closet I keep it in when I’m not beating it fists full of $10 quarter rolls.

The problem is that it does do a lot of stuff. It does more stuff than the Canon PowerShot A20 I used before I got my E-10. Technically speaking, it’s even got some features my E-10 doesn’t have, like continuous 5-zone autofocus and more-zoned evaluative metering. Plus it’s got more pixels. It’s even got a movie-recording mode that doesn’t look half-bad when set to the highest quality.

On top of that, it’s very compact and lightweight. My E-10 weighs two pounds and change. The DSC-S600 weighs “and change”–6.4 ounces, with batteries. It’s small enough to fit in a pocket, whereas the E-10 is small enough to fit in a trunk, and most backpacks.

Of course, that’s not the whole story. The big story is the stuff that’s missing. No aperature- ot shutter-priority mode. As a matter of fact, no exposure control at all beyond a +/- EV setting. That’s no great problem, although it is a problem. The great problem is that there’s no manual focus. I’ve shot days with my E-10 where I rarely futzed with the exposure–most of my time in big bend was spent in completely-automatic Program mode–but I didn’t realize how much I use manual focus. More accurately, I used the super-sharp DSLR focusing screen to tell what’s in focus, even when I wasn’t focusing manually. It makes a huge difference. it is very difficult to tell, with this new camera, what exactly it is that you’re taking a picture of.

Another thing is the resolution. Sure, it’s got 2 million pixels more than the E-10, but that isn’t a huge gain on its face (2240 horizontal pixels to 2816, an extra 25% in horizontal resolution). Moreover, the teeny lens and relatively small amount of light admitted by it combine to make the individual pixels on the S600 considerably noisier and less sharp than on the E-10. I’d definitely go so far as to say that the E-10 produces sharper pictures, even at the lower megapixel count. I should have known that big huge honking lens was good for something.

Almost as important, there’s no lens thread to mount filters and such on the S600. This isn’t a big deal, except for the polarizer. If you don’t think a polarizer is a big deal, check out this image, with no polarizer:

…and this image, with:

Luckily, I can jury-rig a solution by holding my 62MM polarizer in front of the lens. Primitive, but it works.

So the camera sucks compared to a much more sophisticated camera that still sells for half again as much, even after six years. No surprise there. It’s not supposed to replace the E-10, but provide something for me to limp along with until next month, when I can work a little more overtime and replace it with a Canon EOS-300D or EOS-10D. Or maybe, if I’m feeling rich, Canon EOS-350D or even a EOS-20D. They’re coming out with the 30D now, that’s gotta drive prices on the 20D down…

More miscellaneous pics….

Tuesday, February 21st, 2006

When I was posting my Big Bend pics, I noticed that several galleries I’d created weren’t listed on the gallery list on the left. I’m not sure if I didn’t put them here before, or if they got wiped out in my bungled Drupal upgrade attempt, but I re-exported them, and here they are now:

  • Townlakia III – More pictures from Lown Lake, circa October 2005
  • Townlakia IV – Town Lake pics from November. It occurs to me I’ve got quite a bit of year-round Town Lake images.
  • Red Bud Isle – Red Bud Isle, Red Bud Trail at Town Lake, another city park. It’s awesome. November 2005
  • Back Porch Flowers – I saw some flowers on the Patio last November, snapped a few pics.
  • Campus II – Some pics from the UT campus last October.
  • Greenbelt in October – The Greenbelt. In October.
  • Mount Bonnell – Mount Bonnell, a big fault-created hill with Delusions of Grandeur and a cliff on one side. It’s got a nice view of Lake Austin. These are a few pics I snapped in October
  • Still Life — Honeycrisp apples and bottles taken in my bathroom. I’m only uploading this because of an OCD need to match the photos in my screensaver with the photos on my web site. Not really worth looking at, unless you don’t know what a large bottle of Chimay looks like.

Hiking Big Bend

Tuesday, February 21st, 2006

Everything at Big Bend seemed to be destined to go wrong, then be put right. I broke a tent pole, but fixed it with duct tape. My camera started eating batteries, but I brought 28. I forgot to change the ISO from 320, but this gave my pictures a grainy, 50’s-National-Geographic-Park-Feature vibe. I didn’t have the password to Paul’s computer, but called him from the top of Emory Peak to get it.

My plan was to camp out in the basin in the center of the Chisos Mountains, in the center of the park, do some day hikes from the central basin to some of the sights, and also to check out the Rio Grande.

I got to the park about 5p on Friday, and after a discouraging hike where I learned my camera was only taking twenty pictures on a set of batteries, I broke a tent pole and slept in my car the first night there. I don’t want to talk any more about that day.

Friday night was clear and cold, but I stayed pretty warm in my bag. From the window of my car I could see more stars in the sky than I’d ever seen before. I was awakened early in the morning by a light on my face, and opened my eyes to see a moon so bright it was hard to look directly at. I tried to go back to sleep, but ended up playing Tokobot in my bag until it was time to get up. It wasn’t exactly a back-to-nature trip, at least not while it was dark.

The next morning I woke up early and learned you can buy a damned good buffet breakfast from the restaurant at the lodge for seven bucks. I decided to make for Emory peak, and take it easy the first day. It wasn’t as easy as it should have been, but I got there–the highest point in the park, and the second-highest in Texas, at 7825 feet. The lodge was at 5400 feet, so the trail, about four and half miles long, climbed about 2400 feet. The view from the top was peace-inducing. I stayed as long as I could, and then headed back for the bottom.

I hurt all over by the time I got back to the lodge, so I washed down a Big Bend Burger with a Dos Equis at the lodge. It cost four dollars, same as the other Mexican and Texan (Shiner and Lone Star) beers there, while “American” beers, mostly Anheuser-Busch crap plus Fat Tire, were three. I thought this was funny. Of course, most of the people there weren’t from Texas, so it made a certain kind of sense.

I pitched my tent, then spent the next few hours in my car watching Gantz. It seemed a little lame to sit around in the park watching DVDs on a lap top, but if I went to bed when it got dark (8p), then I’d just wake up at four with nothing to do for hours on end. It got cold that night. Really cold. I don’t know how cold, but cold enough I always took the smallest possible sip of water, because anything more would give me chills. My bag was still pretty comfy, as long as I bundled up inside it.

The next morning I hit up the buffet again (fuck backpacking stoves when there’s a restaurant right up the hill), then went down to the hot springs on the Rio Grande. This is a crazy, magical place. There’s a little sand trail that winds between a cliff and sea of river cane on the bank of the Rio Grande until it comes to a building foundation with about two feet of wall left on each side. A hole in the bottom of the foundation lets in 105F spring water, which fills up the foundation until it spills over the lowest corner into the Rio Grande, which runs agains the outside of the foundation and was, when I was there, a few inches below the top of the wall, 12 feet deep and about 67F. It felt like Barton Springs. I’d spent a day and a half sweating my ass off in the Chisos, and this was about my idea of paradise. I stayed there for hours, finally going for a short hike in the desert to the east, then heading out to Boquillas canyon at the southeast corner of the park, where Mexicans from Boquillas set their goods on the American shore, with cups to hold payment and price lists held down with rocks, then wade across at night to collect the money. They hang out in lean-tos on the Mexican bank, I guess so that anybody who’d be cheap enough to cheat them will have to look at the people they’re fucking over while they do it.

That night in mountains was a lot warmer than the one before. I watched Suicide Club before I went to sleep. I understood it less then than I understand it now, but it’s still a very strange movie. I got up the next morning and hiked out to the Window, a large canyon that drains most of the basin and ends in a high pour-off that looks into the Mexican desert. By the time I got back up to the lodge parking lot, I was ready to get out of there. On the way out I stopped by a gas station, and a Schwan’s truck pulled up. Those bastards deliver everywhere.

I really didn’t like the pictures too much when I first got them, and I’m still not real happy, but for the purposes of telling a story, rather than as art for its own sake, they’ll do. They’re all pretty heavily edited to make them less harsh on the eyes.

Eccchhh….I feel bad

Friday, September 30th, 2005

I feel bad. It’s been so long since I posted anything here. Sorry Ma. Not a lot has been going on. I’ve been working a lot, partying a little, not working on my photography nearly enough. I did go to a couple of zoos last weekend, one in San Antonio on Sunday (I also went by the Alamo and the Riverwalk), and the next day to the Austin zoo. I took about 400 pictures in all, of which about 60 were okay and about 20 were really good. About 5 were good enough that I’m proud of them.

Squirrels!

Monday, August 8th, 2005

There’s a bunch of really funny stories behind these pics of some squirrels and their nuts, but I’m not telling you any of ‘em. Stay tuned for some bad ass retouched photos coming up in the next coupla days. (As if it needed to be said, these photos are a little retouched as well, as are quite a few of the ones I post here).